Dian Mukti Wuri


The paper describes the economic influence in the cultural policy seen through the big number of the diaspora of ethnic and national of India in Southeast Asia. Although in one hand, the India diaspora is one of the substantial sources in developing India, however, on the other, there are some obstacles found in this matter, such as that the Indian policy is partial against other countries in Southeast Asia, so as that the countries of Southeast Asia partial against the Indian diaspora. The writer of this paper, starts his argument with the idea to offer double citizenship to the Indian migrants, and then seeing in social perspective the Indian cultural identity in Southeast Asia. Besides this, the writer brings to highlight the bilateral relation between India and Indonesia and last is the importance of how the Indian government places itself among the Southeast Asian countries, which may become a way of approach the countries of Southeast Asia encounter the migrants of India.


policy of India diaspora; Southeast Asia; economy; cultural identity; double citizenship


Full Text:


References (diakses pada tanggal 8 Desember 2014, pada pukul 21.32) (diakses pada tanggal 8 Desember 2014, pada pukul 21.48) (diakses pada tanggal 8 Desember 2014, pada pukul 22.10) (diakses pada tanggal 9 Desember 2014, pada pukul 15.26) (diakses pada tanggal 8 Desember 2014, pada pukul 21.04) (diakses pada tanggal 8 Desember 2014, pada pukul 21.07) (diakses pada tanggal 14 Desember 2014, pada pukul 23.56) (diakses pada tanggal 7 Desember 2014, pada pukul 22.29)

Bean, C. (1995). Determinants of attitudes towards questions of border maintenance in Australia. People and Place, 3(3), 32.

Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2004). Persistent parochialism: trust and exclusion in ethnic networks. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 55(1), 1-23.

Dzvimbo, Kuzvinetsa Peter. 2003. The International Migration of Skilled Human Capital from Developing Countries. Accra.

Gidwani, V., & Sivaramakrishnan, K. (2003). Circular migration and rural cosmopolitanism in India. Contributions to Indian Sociology, 37(1-2), 339-367.

Haubert, J., & Fussell, E. (2006). Explaining Pro‐Immigrant Sentiment in the US: Social Class, Cosmopolitanism, and Perceptions of Immigrants. International Migration Review, 40(3), 489-507.

Hiebert, D. (2002). Cosmopolitanism at the local level: The development of transnational neighbourhoods. Conceiving Cosmopolitanism, 209-233.

Mahbubani, Kishore. 2011. Asia Hemisfer Baru Dunia. Penerbit Buku Kompas: Jakarta.

Kothari, U. (2008). Global peddlers and local networks: migrant cosmopolitanisms. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 26(3), 500-516.

Lamont, M., & Aksartova, S. (2002). Ordinary cosmopolitanisms: Strategies for bridging racial boundaries among working-class men. Theory, Culture & Society, 19(4), 1-25.

Mohan, G. (2006). Embedded cosmopolitanism and the politics of obligation: the Ghanaian diaspora and development. Environment and Planning A, 38(5), 867-883.

Parkins, Natasha. C. 2010. “Push and Pull Factors of Migration”. American Review of Political Economy. The University of West Indies

Roberts, S. (2002). Migration and social security: Parochialism in the global village. Social Security in the Global Village, 8, 211.

Srivastava, R., & Sasikumar, S. K. (2003, June). An overview of migration in India, its impacts and key issues. In Regional Conference on Migration, Development and Pro-Poor Policy Choices in Asia (pp. 22-24).

Szerszynski, B., & Urry, J. (2002). Cultures of cosmopolitanism. The Sociological Review, 50(4), 461-481.

Wickramasekara, P. (2008). Globalisation, international labour migration and the rights of migrant workers. Third World Quarterly, 29(7), 1247-1264.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2017 Paradigma, Jurnal Kajian Budaya


Lisensi Creative Commons
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi-BerbagiSerupa 4.0 Internasional


Free counters!View My Stats